An owner of a third-party home station for the Nintendo switch sued Nyko for tinkering with his device. Michael Skiathitis filed a class action lawsuit against the device manufacturer at the US District Court in central California.
According to Skiathitis, the Nyko Portable Docking Kit that he bought at a Walmart in Florida had his Switch turned off. He sent the device for warranty repair, but will lose all of his recorded data.
"Unbeknownst to consumers, Nyko Portable Anchor Kits for Nintendo Switch are likely to cause many problems to devices that they are intended to support," said trial.
The lawsuit further alleges that Nyko failed to disclose the bug to consumers.
This allegation seems to imply that Nyko had prior knowledge of the flaw, but as the bug did not manifest itself before the 5.0 Switch firmware update, it is unclear how the company could have known about it .
Last month, switch owners using third-party docking stations were upset that their devices were becoming more and more nailed after Nintendo had deployed Firmware Update 5.0. Users indicated that their handhelds were working properly with unlicensed homebase manufacturers such as Nyko, Fastsnail, and Insignia until the update.
When Nyko was informed of the problem, he did some tests to determine what was causing the failures.
A company spokesman said: "We think [the issue] is related to how the switch handles AV output for an external TV / monitor when the console is docked to the kit. home laptop. "
"[Unlicensed products] may not work at all with our gaming systems, and they may have compatibility issues with certain games, the Nintendo Switch system itself and other licensed accessories and peripherals. »
Despite the seemingly bug related to the 5.0 update, Nintendo can not be held responsible for any issues associated with users choosing to use unlicensed products with the Switch. Similarly, Nyko can not be held responsible for any bug that did not exist before a software change in the system. From the point of view of the layman, the case seems so frivolous.
Nintendo repairs the device in question free of charge. The only damage I can see here is the loss of data. While it's unfortunate that the switch does not have a solution in place to back up the data (a big misstep in my opinion), data loss is a reasonable risk that consumers take when it is not possible to save data. they buy electronics.
In this case, the only real loss is that of the games and parameters saved by the users since the games can simply be downloaded. So how much is a game saved anyway?
Who do you think is most responsible for this switch problem? Is it Nintendo who issued the patch that caused the devices failure? Was it Nyko who had a problem with the new update? Or was it the owners of Switch who used unlicensed devices with their systems that they knew could not be backed up?
[ad_2]
Source link