Judge says Amazon not to blame for the hoverboard explosion that burned $ 1 million family home

ebn benghazi
[ad_1]





Summary: Recent years have seen several explosive products, but the most famous (except Note 7) has probably been hoverboards. So many two-wheeled electric scooters were on fire in 2015 that they were banned by major airlines. Amazon, a great card seller, also banned a lot of devices in December of this year, but it was too late to stop one that sparked a fire that destroyed the family's $ 1 million home. Now, a judge ruled that the retail site is not responsible for the incident.



Brian and Megan Fox bought the FITURBO F1 hoverboard at $ 274.79 in November 2015 as a Christmas present for their 14 year old son. On January 9, 2016, the hoverboard exploded while the boy and his daughter were at home. The pair was forced to escape through the windows with the help of their father. All three sustained injuries, including lacerations requiring stitches, fractures and nerve damage. The 4000-square-foot family home was destroyed.



It's never clear who made the hoverboard, but the Fox launched a $ 30 million lawsuit against Amazon. They claimed that the company had never warned them that it could explode, even though Amazon was aware of the fire risks. But a Tennessee judge disagreed.






As noted by CNBC, an Amazon officer filed in the case admitted to having removed a hoverboard from his own home after hearing about their "potential problems". Amazon has also kept money from hoverboard sellers for 90 days instead of 30 preparing for a flood of returns, "There is a potential for running away with this money," wrote one employee, in an internal email.



The couple received an email on December 12, 2015, sent by Amazon to hoverboard buyers who referred to "recent security reports" and offered "safety tips". There was an option to return them, there was no mention of the words "fire" or "explosion".



Judge William Campbell dismissed the case Wednesday, ruling that Amazon was simply a platform used to sell the product, and not legally responsible for the fire. "The role of Amazon in the transaction was to provide a mechanism to facilitate the exchange between the entity seeking to sell the product and the individual who was looking to buy it," he writes



"We are disappointed with the decision and are weighing our options with our clients and should make a decision within the next week or two weeks," said Steven Anderson, Fox's CNBC attorney. .








[ad_2]

Source link

إرسال تعليق

Cookie Consent
نستخدم ملفات تعريف الارتباط على هذا الموقع لتحليل حركة المرور، وتذكر تفضيلاتك، وتحسين تجربتك.
Oops!
يبدو أن هناك مشكلة في اتصالك بالإنترنت. يرجى الاتصال بالإنترنت والبدء في التصفح مرة أخرى.
AdBlock Detected!
لقد اكتشفنا أنك تستخدم إضافة حظر الإعلانات في متصفحك.
الإيرادات التي نحصل عليها من الإعلانات تُستخدم لإدارة هذا الموقع، نطلب منك إضافة موقعنا إلى قائمة الاستثناءات في إضافة حظر الإعلانات الخاصة بك.